Never Punt & Always Onside Kick

I have an article that I would love for you to read … it is pasted below … but before you look, I would like to give you several things to think about while you are reading it …

1. We tell our kids early on that we don’t punt so they actually gain a certain confidence that coach believes in them so much that he knows on day one that we wont be punting all year long …

2. By going for the onside kick all year long on every kickoff, our kids get a ton of experience and live reps getting after the football … and we get pretty good at recovering the ball … this is absolutely huge for us … as we get more possessions in most of our games than we would by kicking deep …

3. We have absolutely ELIMINATED the possibility of a blocked punt, punt return or kick return for a TD … these are absolutely HUGE plays in the course of a football game as our opponents often find out the hard way … momentum and attitude changes during a game are often impossible to overcome and this is how we limit our opponents opportunities for those type of plays … at the youth level we don’t return punts either to make sure that we never fumble or muff the catch and turn the ball over …

4. I honestly believe that over the course of the year, the field position issue is almost irrelevant … yes on occasion it hurts our team but of course on plenty of occasions we convert on 4th down or we recover that onside kick … overall I am positive that we gain far more than we lose … besides one thing I have learned is that in most games our offense is either going to move the ball freely or we will need 4 downs to get a first because their defense is that good … I have also learned that our defense is either going to stop them from scoring or let them score … the position on the field is usually irrelevant … especially in youth football but the same seemed to hold true at the freshman level … if our opponents were going to score it was going to happen from the 20 as easily as it happened from the 50 … which brings me to my next point …

5. If they are going to score, I damn sure want it to happen quickly … I really mean that … if we are going to give up a TD, then I want to give it up NOW … giving up quicker scores means 2 things to our team … first, we get more possessions (effective offenses actually WANT more possessions) and with our ball control offense we want as many possessions as we can get … and second, if it is late in the half or late in the game we want as much time on the clock as possible so that we can march the length of the field if necessary …

6. Practice time saved … mostly just on our Punt and Punt Return team as we still must practice our Kickoff (just shorter amount of field required) … but we almost never practice punting … usually just once per season to see if we actually have a snapper or punter who can do the job but it is mostly a half-hearted effort on my part as I have no intention of ever doing it …

7. Think about this as well … if a team is good enough to stop your offense, if they are good enough that you are afraid of giving them good field position, if they are good enough that you are worried about losing field position for your own offense … well then they are probably good enough to run back a Punt or Kickoff also … and they are probably going to make you pay if you muff the catch when they punt it to you …

8. Time of possession and number of possessions are important in any game but this importance is magnified for a Ball Control Smash Mouth Offense like our Double Wing … and another thing to remember is that we dont face many 3rd and long or 4th and long situations … when we say that we dont Punt, its not like that translates to us going for 4th and 10 several times per game … we are an offense that runs the ball a lot and almost never has negative yards on anything we do … so unless we make mistakes, commit penalties or just take plays off, we almost never need more than 2-3 yards on our 4th down attempts …

So now that I have you thinking about why we chose to go against the grain of traditional football ideas … here is an article about a very successful HS Coach and how he came to believe in the same ideas that I subscribe to …

Arkansas Coach Punts Traditional Game Plan

Jeff Fedotin
Special to Rivals High from Yahoo! Sports

Kevin Kelley decided to flip football convention on its head after Pulaski (Ark.) Academy’s second game of the 2007 season.

Never a fan of taking his offense off the field, the coach became miffed when his Bruins punted away to Pine Bluff (Ark.) Dollarway High only to see Pulaski allow an 80-yard touchdown on the return.

“That was stupid,” Kelley said. “We should’ve gone for it.”

As a result, his 2008 team did not punt during 14 games. Such an unorthodox strategy may seem like lunacy, but it was successful: Pulaski won the 5A state title on Dec. 6.

Kelley’s team only punted twice in 2007 − once as an act of sportsmanship to prevent running up the score − and never after that Dollarway game.

Kelley has reasons to go for it.

Keeping the offense on the field on fourth down allows for more creative play-calling. Third-and-long does not have to be a passing down. The Little Rock school can run the ball, throw a screen pass or use any number of formations. Defenses do not know whether to use a nickel or dime defense. And Pulaski’s offense has less pressure on third down.

“We don’t really worry too much about it,” quarterback Spencer Keith said. “We just get as many yards as we can. We don’t have to go for the first down.”

If Pulaski converts on fourth down, it creates a momentum change similar to a turnover. Other high school coaches have told Kelley they would rather see his team punt.

The Bruins even avoid punting when the defense has stopped them inside their own 10-yard line.

“You can just tell people are in the stands thinking, ‘You’re an idiot,’ ” Kelley said.

Kelley supports this rationale with numbers analysis.

If Pulaski has a fourth-and-8 at its own 5-yard line, Kelley said his explosive offense likely will convert a first down at least 50 percent of the time. If it fails to convert, statistical data from the college level shows that an opponent acquiring the ball inside the 10-yard line scores a touchdown 90 percent of the time. If Pulaski punts away (i.e., a 40-yard punt with a 10-yard return) the other team will start with the ball on the 38-yard line and score a touchdown 77 percent of the time. The difference is only 13 percent.

An innovative and statistics-minded coach, Kelley had tinkered with eschewing the punting game since winning his first state championship in 2003. He became further emboldened after reading several studies, including “Do Firms Maximize? Evidence from Pro Football,” by University of California-Berkeley economics professor David Romer. Kelley also examined ZEUS, a computer program developed by Chuck Bower, who has a doctorate in astrophysics, and Frank Frigo, a game theory expert, to model and predict football outcomes.

The Pulaski coach has adopted an unusual approach to kickoffs as well. About 75 percent of the time, he uses an onside kick instead of a standard kickoff. To illustrate why, Kelley again relies on numbers.

If his team does not recover the onside kick, the opponent likely will field the kick around its own 47-yard line. On a typical kickoff, the other team usually starts around the 33-yard line.

“You’re only giving up 14 yards,” Kelley said. “And you get a chance to get the ball.”

Pulaski features seven different kinds of onside kicks, including bunching eight players on one side of the field and three on the other; faking the kick with one kicker while another player shifts over to kick to a vacated spot in coverage; clustering all 11 players before spreading out just as the ball is kicked; bouncing a hard kick off the turf for a jump ball and launching a “helicopter kick” by kicking a ball placed on the ground against the tee. The latter strategy causes the ball to spin like a helicopter’s propeller and move like a curveball.

“Much like the punting situation, [the onside kick] becomes something the other team has to work on a lot during the week,” Kelley said. “That’s taking time from their preparation against your offense or defense. So it all works towards the common goal.”

For Kelley’s objective of winning games with a risky but aggressive offense, Pulaski had the perfect quarterback. Keith, who has received major interest from Louisiana Tech, Arkansas State and several Ivy League schools, could make defenses pay for not stopping the Bruins on fourth down. And if the other team scores off a short field because of a missed fourth-down opportunity, the unflappable passer could compensate by scoring points in a hurry.

Kelley called him the most athletic quarterback he has ever coached, and Keith set the state record with 5,308 passing yards this season. He also possesses the requisite accuracy for an offense that threw on about 45 of its 75 plays a game and averaged 570 total yards.

“It’s a really fun offense,” Keith said. “I wouldn’t change it for anything.”

A possible pre-med or pre-engineering student who scored a 30 on the ACT, Keith has the intelligence to master an intricate scheme, which features pre- and post-snap reads with receivers making adjustments based on coverage.

With Keith and several other impact players returning from his 2007 team, Kelley said he knew his team had the potential for a state title this year. When the media asked for his pick of the No. 1 team in Arkansas before the season, Kelley chose Pulaski and consequently received some heat.

“It was just confidence in my guys,” he said. “I thought this might be one of the better teams we’ve ever had.”

His prediction proved to be on the mark. Although Pulaski lost its first game of the season, 46-29, to West Helena, it reeled off 13 consecutive wins and avenged that Week 1 defeat with a 35-32 state title victory against the Cougars.

During the offseason Kelley will begin investigating different football strategies. He also plans to further study the punting game by analyzing specific instances where punting may prove statistically superior.

After Kelley searches through data, Pulaski may tweak its approach next year. His 2009 team could punt on occasion, or he may develop a new tactic that defies the norms of football but gives his team an edge.

“Just because something’s always been done that way,” Kelley said, “doesn’t mean it should continue to be done that way.”

Leave a Reply